Triple
T20388072
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Blair brothers composing team |
E498008
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasMember |
P10
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Will Blair |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Will Blair | Statement: [Blair brothers composing team, hasMember, Will Blair]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Will Blair Context triple: [Blair brothers composing team, hasMember, Will Blair]
-
A.
Will Blair
chosen
Will Blair is a film composer best known for his atmospheric, tension-building scores for independent thrillers such as "Green Room."
-
B.
Blair Forward
Blair Forward is a musician best known as a member of Kevin Costner's country-rock band, Kevin Costner & Modern West.
-
C.
Gordon Brown
Gordon Brown is a British politician who served as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom from 2007 to 2010 and was previously a long-serving Chancellor of the Exchequer.
-
D.
Blair
Blair is the individual taxpayer involved as the petitioner in the U.S. Supreme Court case Blair v. Commissioner, which addressed issues of federal income taxation.
-
E.
Blair
Blair is an Australian federal electoral division in Queensland represented in the House of Representatives.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4a71ebc8190b153a36c738730f4 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6790d9e5881908bde7da9e5e541a0 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 7:05 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:28 a.m.