Triple

T20381446
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Quincy City Council E497837 entity
Predicate openMeetingsLaw P11970 FINISHED
Object Washington Open Public Meetings Act NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Washington Open Public Meetings Act | Statement: [Quincy City Council, openMeetingsLaw, Washington Open Public Meetings Act]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Washington Open Public Meetings Act
Context triple: [Quincy City Council, openMeetingsLaw, Washington Open Public Meetings Act]
  • A. Texas Open Meetings Act
    The Texas Open Meetings Act is a state law that requires governmental bodies in Texas to conduct their meetings transparently, with advance public notice and open access to deliberations and decisions.
  • B. Brown Act open meeting laws of California
    The Brown Act open meeting laws of California are state statutes that require local government bodies to conduct their meetings transparently and publicly, ensuring citizens have access to the decision-making process.
  • C. Alabama Open Meetings Act
    The Alabama Open Meetings Act is a state law that requires governmental bodies in Alabama to conduct their meetings transparently and provide public access, with limited exceptions.
  • D. District of Columbia Open Meetings Act
    The District of Columbia Open Meetings Act is a transparency law that requires most D.C. government bodies to conduct their meetings openly and provide public access to their deliberations and decisions.
  • E. Colorado Open Meetings laws
    Colorado Open Meetings laws are state statutes that require governmental bodies in Colorado to conduct their meetings transparently and provide public access to their deliberations and decision-making processes.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Washington Open Public Meetings Act
Target entity description: The Washington Open Public Meetings Act is a state law that requires meetings of public agencies in Washington to be conducted openly and with advance public notice to ensure government transparency and accountability.
  • A. Texas Open Meetings Act
    The Texas Open Meetings Act is a state law that requires governmental bodies in Texas to conduct their meetings transparently, with advance public notice and open access to deliberations and decisions.
  • B. Brown Act open meeting laws of California
    The Brown Act open meeting laws of California are state statutes that require local government bodies to conduct their meetings transparently and publicly, ensuring citizens have access to the decision-making process.
  • C. Alabama Open Meetings Act
    The Alabama Open Meetings Act is a state law that requires governmental bodies in Alabama to conduct their meetings transparently and provide public access, with limited exceptions.
  • D. District of Columbia Open Meetings Act
    The District of Columbia Open Meetings Act is a transparency law that requires most D.C. government bodies to conduct their meetings openly and provide public access to their deliberations and decisions.
  • E. Colorado Open Meetings laws
    Colorado Open Meetings laws are state statutes that require governmental bodies in Colorado to conduct their meetings transparently and provide public access to their deliberations and decision-making processes.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b4a5b7908190a972e4e7e698ae94 completed April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e678b0ee708190bdbe4aab28a61525 completed April 20, 2026, 7:04 p.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:27 a.m.