Triple
T20375359
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mafia Commission Trial |
E497677
|
entity |
| Predicate | alsoKnownAs |
P39
|
FINISHED |
| Object | United States v. Anthony Salerno et al. |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: United States v. Anthony Salerno et al. | Statement: [Mafia Commission Trial, alsoKnownAs, United States v. Anthony Salerno et al.]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: United States v. Anthony Salerno et al. Context triple: [Mafia Commission Trial, alsoKnownAs, United States v. Anthony Salerno et al.]
-
A.
United States v. Giordano
United States v. Giordano is a U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the strict procedural requirements for federal wiretap authorizations and limited who may approve such surveillance orders.
-
B.
United States v. Anthony Russo
United States v. Anthony Russo was a federal criminal case arising from the Pentagon Papers scandal, in which Anthony Russo was prosecuted alongside Daniel Ellsberg for their role in the unauthorized copying and disclosure of classified government documents about the Vietnam War.
-
C.
United States v. Classic
United States v. Classic is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court decision that expanded federal authority over primary elections by holding that Congress can regulate primaries when they are an integral part of the electoral process for federal offices.
-
D.
United States v. Eichman
United States v. Eichman is a 1990 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down a federal law banning flag desecration as unconstitutional under the First Amendment’s protection of free speech.
-
E.
United States v. Patane
United States v. Patane is a U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited the exclusionary rule by holding that physical evidence obtained as a result of unwarned but voluntary statements is admissible despite a Miranda violation.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: United States v. Anthony Salerno et al. Target entity description: United States v. Anthony Salerno et al. was a landmark 1980s federal racketeering case that targeted the leadership of New York’s Five Families and significantly weakened the American Mafia’s governing body.
-
A.
United States v. Giordano
United States v. Giordano is a U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the strict procedural requirements for federal wiretap authorizations and limited who may approve such surveillance orders.
-
B.
United States v. Anthony Russo
United States v. Anthony Russo was a federal criminal case arising from the Pentagon Papers scandal, in which Anthony Russo was prosecuted alongside Daniel Ellsberg for their role in the unauthorized copying and disclosure of classified government documents about the Vietnam War.
-
C.
United States v. Classic
United States v. Classic is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court decision that expanded federal authority over primary elections by holding that Congress can regulate primaries when they are an integral part of the electoral process for federal offices.
-
D.
United States v. Eichman
United States v. Eichman is a 1990 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down a federal law banning flag desecration as unconstitutional under the First Amendment’s protection of free speech.
-
E.
United States v. Patane
United States v. Patane is a U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited the exclusionary rule by holding that physical evidence obtained as a result of unwarned but voluntary statements is admissible despite a Miranda violation.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4a5b7908190a972e4e7e698ae94 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e678acae3c8190ae04323760bf5597 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 7:04 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:27 a.m.