Triple
T20363174
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Constitution Act 1975 (Victoria) |
E496834
|
entity |
| Predicate | entrenchedBy |
P11185
|
FINISHED |
| Object | special majority requirements in Parliament |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: special majority requirements in Parliament | Statement: [Constitution Act 1975 (Victoria), entrenchedBy, special majority requirements in Parliament]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: entrenchedBy Context triple: [Constitution Act 1975 (Victoria), entrenchedBy, special majority requirements in Parliament]
-
A.
entrenched
chosen
Indicates that something is firmly and deeply established in a position, practice, or condition, making it difficult to change or remove.
-
B.
clinchedBy
Indicates that a particular outcome, title, or achievement has been definitively secured or guaranteed by a specific entity.
-
C.
contestedBy
Indicates that one party challenges, disputes, or opposes a claim, decision, or position held by another party.
-
D.
enteredIntoForceBy
Indicates that a legal instrument, agreement, or provision became legally effective as a result of an action taken by a specified authority, event, or instrument.
-
E.
heldTerritory
Indicates that one entity maintained control or possession over a specific territory or geographic area.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4a4f9b081908a5a021919c21ccb |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6786efd2c8190821932ddcdef1a2f |
completed | April 20, 2026, 7:03 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e57648be3c81908256838228cabf5c |
completed | April 20, 2026, 12:41 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:26 a.m.