Triple

T20358654
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. Halderman E496716 entity
Predicate relatedCase P3137 FINISHED
Object Halderman v. Pennhurst State School & Hospital — NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Halderman v. Pennhurst State School & Hospital | Statement: [Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. Halderman, relatedCase, Halderman v. Pennhurst State School & Hospital]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Halderman v. Pennhurst State School & Hospital
Context triple: [Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. Halderman, relatedCase, Halderman v. Pennhurst State School & Hospital]
  • A. Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. Halderman chosen
    Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. Halderman is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that limited federal court authority over state institutions by holding that the Eleventh Amendment bars federal courts from ordering state officials to comply with state law.
  • B. Murdock v. Pennsylvania
    Murdock v. Pennsylvania is a 1943 U.S. Supreme Court case that held it unconstitutional to impose a license tax on the distribution of religious literature, reinforcing First Amendment protections for religious proselytizing.
  • C. Martin v. City of Struthers
    Martin v. City of Struthers is a 1943 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a city ordinance banning door-to-door leaflet distribution, reinforcing First Amendment protections for free speech and religious proselytizing.
  • D. Apprendi v. New Jersey
    Apprendi v. New Jersey is a landmark 2000 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that any fact (other than a prior conviction) that increases a criminal defendant’s sentence beyond the statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury and proved beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • E. County of Allegheny v. ACLU
    County of Allegheny v. ACLU is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court case that refined the interpretation of the Establishment Clause by addressing the constitutionality of religious holiday displays on government property.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b4a3f7f48190b37f354574028ca6 completed April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e678573fc481908bf257e6ed41d750 completed April 20, 2026, 7:02 p.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:25 a.m.