Triple
T20358538
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Edward T. Young |
E496714
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableWork |
P4
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Ex parte Young (as named respondent) |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Ex parte Young (as named respondent) | Statement: [Edward T. Young, notableWork, Ex parte Young (as named respondent)]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Ex parte Young (as named respondent) Context triple: [Edward T. Young, notableWork, Ex parte Young (as named respondent)]
-
A.
Ex parte Young
chosen
Ex parte Young is a landmark 1908 U.S. Supreme Court decision that created a legal fiction allowing suits in federal court against state officials to stop ongoing violations of federal law, despite state sovereign immunity under the Eleventh Amendment.
-
B.
De Jonge v. Oregon
De Jonge v. Oregon is a 1937 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the right to peaceful assembly is a fundamental liberty protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and thus applies to the states.
-
C.
Ex parte Yerger
Ex parte Yerger is an 1869 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited Congress’s ability to strip the Court of jurisdiction and affirmed the Court’s power to review certain habeas corpus decisions.
-
D.
Edwards v. Balisok
Edwards v. Balisok is a 1997 U.S. Supreme Court decision that applied the Heck v. Humphrey doctrine to prison disciplinary proceedings, limiting when inmates can seek damages under §1983 if success would imply the invalidity of disciplinary sanctions affecting the length of confinement.
-
E.
Collins v. Youngblood
Collins v. Youngblood is a 1990 U.S. Supreme Court decision that narrowed the scope of the Ex Post Facto Clause by holding that it applies only to certain retroactive criminal laws that alter definitions of crimes or increase punishments.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4a3f7f48190b37f354574028ca6 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e67855c3a88190b88839a47d01184d |
completed | April 20, 2026, 7:02 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:25 a.m.