Triple
T20358211
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Rules of Reasoning in Philosophy |
E496705
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasRule |
P2846
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Rule III |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Rule III | Statement: [Rules of Reasoning in Philosophy, hasRule, Rule III]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Rule III Context triple: [Rules of Reasoning in Philosophy, hasRule, Rule III]
-
A.
Rule I
Rule I is the opening guideline in René Descartes’ unfinished work "Rules for the Direction of the Mind," where he begins outlining his method for achieving clear and certain knowledge.
-
B.
Rule 3
Rule 3 is a provision within the Massachusetts Rules of Criminal Procedure that governs a specific aspect of criminal case processing in Massachusetts courts.
-
C.
Rule 3
Rule 3 is a provision within the Maine Rules of Civil Procedure that governs how civil actions are formally initiated in Maine’s courts.
-
D.
Rule 3
Rule 3 is a provision of the Rhode Island Rules of Civil Procedure that governs how and when a civil action is formally commenced in the state’s courts.
-
E.
Rule VI
Rule VI is one of René Descartes’ methodological guidelines in "Rules for the Direction of the Mind," outlining a specific step in his rational procedure for attaining clear and certain knowledge.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Rule III Target entity description: Rule III is one of Isaac Newton’s methodological principles in the *Rules of Reasoning in Philosophy*, guiding how general laws of nature are inferred from empirical observations.
-
A.
Rule I
Rule I is the opening guideline in René Descartes’ unfinished work "Rules for the Direction of the Mind," where he begins outlining his method for achieving clear and certain knowledge.
-
B.
Rule 3
Rule 3 is a provision within the Massachusetts Rules of Criminal Procedure that governs a specific aspect of criminal case processing in Massachusetts courts.
-
C.
Rule 3
Rule 3 is a provision within the Maine Rules of Civil Procedure that governs how civil actions are formally initiated in Maine’s courts.
-
D.
Rule 3
Rule 3 is a provision of the Rhode Island Rules of Civil Procedure that governs how and when a civil action is formally commenced in the state’s courts.
-
E.
Rule VI
Rule VI is one of René Descartes’ methodological guidelines in "Rules for the Direction of the Mind," outlining a specific step in his rational procedure for attaining clear and certain knowledge.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4a3f7f48190b37f354574028ca6 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e67855c3a88190b88839a47d01184d |
completed | April 20, 2026, 7:02 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:25 a.m.