Triple

T20352272
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject UGC E496041 entity
Predicate hasCatalogNumberingScheme P37553 FINISHED
Object UGC number LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: UGC number | Statement: [UGC, hasCatalogNumberingScheme, UGC number]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasCatalogNumberingScheme
Context triple: [UGC, hasCatalogNumberingScheme, UGC number]
  • A. hasCategoryNumbering
    Indicates that an entity is assigned or associated with a specific category-based numbering or index within a classification system.
  • B. hasCabinetNumberingSystem
    Indicates that there is a specific scheme or method used to assign and organize identification numbers to cabinets.
  • C. historicalNumberingScheme
    Indicates that the associated numbering system or identifier reflects a past or legacy scheme that was used historically rather than the current one.
  • D. isNumberedBy chosen
    Indicates that an entity is assigned, identified, or organized by a specific number or numbering scheme.
  • E. usesHarmonizedNumberingWith
    Indicates that two entities apply the same standardized numbering scheme so their identifiers or codes are directly comparable or aligned.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b4a3f7f48190b37f354574028ca6 completed April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e67850ace48190b19aff5780fef7e8 completed April 20, 2026, 7:02 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e57636b4808190bc2855af48a3ccdc completed April 20, 2026, 12:41 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:25 a.m.