Triple
T20347852
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | France at the Eurovision Song Contest 2009 |
E495918
|
entity |
| Predicate | qualifiedAutomaticallyForFinal |
P106510
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [France at the Eurovision Song Contest 2009, qualifiedAutomaticallyForFinal, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: qualifiedAutomaticallyForFinal Context triple: [France at the Eurovision Song Contest 2009, qualifiedAutomaticallyForFinal, true]
-
A.
finalInstanceFor
Indicates that one entity serves as the definitive or last instance associated with another entity.
-
B.
includesFinal
Indicates that one entity contains or encompasses another entity as its concluding or last part.
-
C.
isFinalArbiterOf
Indicates that one entity has ultimate, authoritative decision-making power over another entity or over a particular matter, with no further appeal beyond that entity.
-
D.
finalPassing
Indicates that an entity successfully completes or passes a final evaluation, test, or stage in a process.
-
E.
qualifyingFor
chosen
Indicates that one entity meets the necessary conditions or criteria to be eligible for another entity, status, or action.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4a3320881909495ae8bc30bc2dc |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e67839e7b48190876ce7133a20c65b |
completed | April 20, 2026, 7:02 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e57636b4808190bc2855af48a3ccdc |
completed | April 20, 2026, 12:41 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:24 a.m.