Triple
T20345032
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Wedgemount Lake Trail |
E495843
|
entity |
| Predicate | isChallenging |
P77705
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Wedgemount Lake Trail, isChallenging, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isChallenging Context triple: [Wedgemount Lake Trail, isChallenging, true]
-
A.
mayBeChallengedBy
Indicates that one entity is allowed or able to be opposed, questioned, or contested by another entity.
-
B.
hasChallengingApproach
chosen
Indicates that the approach or method involved in reaching or engaging with something is difficult, complex, or demanding.
-
C.
hasChallenge
Indicates that an entity faces, experiences, or is confronted with a particular difficulty, obstacle, or problem.
-
D.
challengeType
Indicates the specific category or kind of challenge associated with an action or relationship between entities.
-
E.
hasMoreChallengingConditionsIn
Indicates that one situation, environment, or context involves stricter, harsher, or more demanding conditions than another within a specified domain.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4a3320881909495ae8bc30bc2dc |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e67838744481909069b76b25dd4bb9 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 7:02 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e57636b4808190bc2855af48a3ccdc |
completed | April 20, 2026, 12:41 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:24 a.m.