Triple

T20327484
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject 1E 0102.2-7219 E492377 entity
Predicate hasEmissionLine P84901 FINISHED
Object [O III] optical lines LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: [O III] optical lines | Statement: [1E 0102.2-7219, hasEmissionLine, [O III] optical lines]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasEmissionLine
Context triple: [1E 0102.2-7219, hasEmissionLine, [O III] optical lines]
  • A. hasSpectralLines chosen
    Indicates that one entity exhibits or is characterized by specific spectral lines associated with another entity.
  • B. dominantEmissionLines
    Indicates that the specified emission lines are the most intense or prominent spectral features in the observed emission from an object or region.
  • C. hasMaserEmission
    Indicates that an object exhibits detectable maser (microwave amplification by stimulated emission of radiation) emission.
  • D. emitsSpectrum
    Indicates that one entity produces or gives off electromagnetic radiation characterized by a particular spectrum.
  • E. hasSpectralChannel
    Indicates that something possesses or is associated with a specific spectral channel or band within an electromagnetic spectrum.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b4a0134081909113563e1c3ba68a completed April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e677e513608190b70527cd9f4d5da3 completed April 20, 2026, 7 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e5762655ac8190a8cc48a29fa2c0c4 completed April 20, 2026, 12:41 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:21 a.m.