Triple

T20325878
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Adrian Lee E492336 entity
Predicate hasRelationshipTypeWithBenBoykewich P139689 FINISHED
Object romantic relationship LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: romantic relationship | Statement: [Adrian Lee, hasRelationshipTypeWithBenBoykewich, romantic relationship]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasRelationshipTypeWithBenBoykewich
Context triple: [Adrian Lee, hasRelationshipTypeWithBenBoykewich, romantic relationship]
  • A. hasRelationshipTypeWith Alexandra Bergson
    Indicates that there exists a specific type or category of relationship between an entity and Alexandra Bergson.
  • B. relationshipToBenny
    Indicates the specific type of personal or social relationship that an entity has with Benny.
  • C. relationshipToBoDecker
    Indicates the specific type of personal or social relationship an entity has with Bo Decker.
  • D. hasRelationshipTypeWithJoelKnox
    Indicates that an entity has a specific type of relationship or association with Joel Knox.
  • E. relationshipToBobinot
    Indicates the nature or type of relationship that one entity has with Bobinot.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b4a0134081909113563e1c3ba68a completed April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e6778f20288190b1862d6be61bfb67 completed April 20, 2026, 6:59 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e5762655ac8190a8cc48a29fa2c0c4 completed April 20, 2026, 12:41 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e58d7481508190a87c8b88f9df9879 completed April 20, 2026, 2:20 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:21 a.m.