Triple
T2032282
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hesperopeuce |
E44543
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasDisputedCircumscription |
P35424
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Hesperopeuce, hasDisputedCircumscription, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasDisputedCircumscription Context triple: [Hesperopeuce, hasDisputedCircumscription, true]
-
A.
hasDisputedStatus
Indicates that the status or classification of something is contested, uncertain, or not universally agreed upon.
-
B.
hasDisputedStatusWith
Indicates that there is a contested or unresolved status, claim, or standing between the related entities.
-
C.
disputedSections
Indicates that specific parts or portions of something are contested, challenged, or not mutually agreed upon between parties.
-
D.
statusDisputedBy
Indicates that the validity, accuracy, or recognition of a status is being challenged or contested by a specified party.
-
E.
disputedAspect
Indicates that a particular feature, detail, or component of something is subject to disagreement or contention between parties.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a889144f2481909932f0746a93023d |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abb9313134819088133fb69b8f606f |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:35 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abb7a8125881909c0cb58b777c1faa |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:29 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69abb90ec7948190bbfb0329e9e67cca |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:35 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:38 p.m.