Triple
T20321250
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | judicial branch of Syria |
E492210
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasSpecializedCourt |
P1198
|
FINISHED |
| Object | state security courts |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: state security courts | Statement: [judicial branch of Syria, hasSpecializedCourt, state security courts]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: state security courts Context triple: [judicial branch of Syria, hasSpecializedCourt, state security courts]
-
A.
Internal security courts
Internal security courts are special judicial bodies used by the Palestinian Authority to handle cases related to internal security, political offenses, and alleged threats to public order, often operating with limited transparency and due process.
-
B.
state security archives
State security archives are collections of records and documents produced by a country's secret police or intelligence services, often used to investigate past surveillance, repression, and human rights abuses.
-
C.
Judicial Security Division
The Judicial Security Division is a branch of the U.S. Marshals Service responsible for protecting federal judges, courthouses, and other components of the federal judicial system.
-
D.
central security agencies
Central security agencies are national-level organizations responsible for maintaining internal security, intelligence gathering, and coordination of law enforcement across a country.
-
E.
NIA Special Courts
NIA Special Courts are designated Indian courts that exclusively handle cases investigated by the National Investigation Agency, particularly those involving terrorism and national security offenses.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: state security courts Target entity description: State security courts are special tribunals in Syria that handle politically sensitive and national security-related cases, often criticized for lacking transparency and fair trial guarantees.
-
A.
Internal security courts
Internal security courts are special judicial bodies used by the Palestinian Authority to handle cases related to internal security, political offenses, and alleged threats to public order, often operating with limited transparency and due process.
-
B.
state security archives
State security archives are collections of records and documents produced by a country's secret police or intelligence services, often used to investigate past surveillance, repression, and human rights abuses.
-
C.
Judicial Security Division
The Judicial Security Division is a branch of the U.S. Marshals Service responsible for protecting federal judges, courthouses, and other components of the federal judicial system.
-
D.
central security agencies
Central security agencies are national-level organizations responsible for maintaining internal security, intelligence gathering, and coordination of law enforcement across a country.
-
E.
NIA Special Courts
NIA Special Courts are designated Indian courts that exclusively handle cases investigated by the National Investigation Agency, particularly those involving terrorism and national security offenses.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4a0134081909113563e1c3ba68a |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6778b8b648190b80badaf15be2599 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 6:59 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:20 a.m.