Triple
T20316391
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Railways Act 2005 |
E510389
|
entity |
| Predicate | allocatesResponsibilityFor |
P105961
|
FINISHED |
| Object | rail strategy in Great Britain |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: rail strategy in Great Britain | Statement: [Railways Act 2005, allocatesResponsibilityFor, rail strategy in Great Britain]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: allocatesResponsibilityFor Context triple: [Railways Act 2005, allocatesResponsibilityFor, rail strategy in Great Britain]
-
A.
responsibleFor
Indicates that one entity has a duty, obligation, or role to manage, oversee, or be accountable for another entity or outcome.
-
B.
grantsResponsibility
chosen
Indicates that one entity assigns or confers a duty, role, or obligation to another entity.
-
C.
reallocatedResponsibilityFrom
Indicates that responsibility for something was transferred away from one party and assigned to another.
-
D.
accountabilityTo
Indicates that one entity is responsible for explaining, justifying, or answering for its actions, decisions, or outcomes to another entity.
-
E.
allottedTo
Indicates that something has been assigned or allocated to a particular entity as its designated recipient or user.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4c7491c8190961113c4283b10b0 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:07 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e67787af188190bc32a3049c9c5b39 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 6:59 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e55b21b09081909e46691b6f45a07f |
completed | April 19, 2026, 10:45 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:19 a.m.