Triple

T20310268
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Rosies E510218 entity
Predicate detainsStatus P13715 FINISHED
Object pretrial detainees LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: pretrial detainees | Statement: [Rosies, detainsStatus, pretrial detainees]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: detainsStatus
Context triple: [Rosies, detainsStatus, pretrial detainees]
  • A. detaineeStatus chosen
    Indicates the current legal or custodial condition of a person being detained, such as whether they are in custody, released, or under a specific detention regime.
  • B. detainedBy
    Indicates that an entity is being held in custody or confinement by another entity, typically an authority or controlling party.
  • C. detainedFor
    Indicates that one entity is being held in custody or confinement because of, or as a consequence of, another entity (such as a reason, charge, or event).
  • D. detentionOutcome
    Indicates the result or consequence of a detention, such as whether it was continued, ended, or changed in status.
  • E. detainsUnder
    Indicates that one entity holds another in custody or confinement under a specific legal authority, provision, or condition.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b4c7491c8190961113c4283b10b0 completed April 16, 2026, 10:07 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e677436af88190a046c44fa45b68b4 completed April 20, 2026, 6:58 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e55b21b09081909e46691b6f45a07f completed April 19, 2026, 10:45 p.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:19 a.m.