Triple

T20301547
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Syrianska FC E505490 entity
Predicate hasLanguageOfSupporters P35567 FINISHED
Object Swedish LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Swedish | Statement: [Syrianska FC, hasLanguageOfSupporters, Swedish]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLanguageOfSupporters
Context triple: [Syrianska FC, hasLanguageOfSupporters, Swedish]
  • A. hasLanguageRepresentation
    Indicates that an entity is expressed, encoded, or represented using a particular natural or formal language.
  • B. hasRepresentativeLanguage
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a language that serves as its primary or officially recognized means of representation or communication.
  • C. hasLanguageResources
    Indicates that an entity possesses or provides resources related to a particular language, such as tools, materials, or services supporting its use or study.
  • D. hasLanguages chosen
    Indicates that an entity is associated with one or more languages it uses, supports, or is expressed in.
  • E. hasLanguageStatus
    Indicates that an entity has a particular status or condition regarding its language use, recognition, or classification.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b4b8ab648190906e18538c250148 completed April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e6770d82b48190b21ce7c52ec6d5a0 completed April 20, 2026, 6:57 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e55b21b09081909e46691b6f45a07f completed April 19, 2026, 10:45 p.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:17 a.m.