Triple

T20299286
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject The Rhyming Poem E505435 entity
Predicate rhymeUsage P8081 FINISHED
Object systematic end-rhyme throughout most of the poem LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: systematic end-rhyme throughout most of the poem | Statement: [The Rhyming Poem, rhymeUsage, systematic end-rhyme throughout most of the poem]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: rhymeUsage
Context triple: [The Rhyming Poem, rhymeUsage, systematic end-rhyme throughout most of the poem]
  • A. hasRhymingText
    Indicates that two pieces of text share a rhyming relationship, typically ending with similar or identical sounds.
  • B. hasRhymeStyle
    Indicates that two linguistic elements share the same pattern or style of rhyming.
  • C. refrainWord
    Indicates that one entity avoids using, mentioning, or expressing a particular word or term in relation to another entity or context.
  • D. rhymeScheme chosen
    Indicates the pattern of end sounds in a sequence of lines, showing which lines rhyme with each other.
  • E. hasTraditionalRhyme
    Indicates that something is associated with or characterized by a conventional or culturally established rhyme.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b4b8ab648190906e18538c250148 completed April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e6770b9484819090ffcb339f2a435a completed April 20, 2026, 6:57 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e55b21b09081909e46691b6f45a07f completed April 19, 2026, 10:45 p.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 11:16 a.m.