Triple

T20280230
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Klaatu barada nikto E503118 entity
Predicate hasSequelRemakeContext P139528 FINISHED
Object referenced in discussions of 2008 remake LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: referenced in discussions of 2008 remake | Statement: [Klaatu barada nikto, hasSequelRemakeContext, referenced in discussions of 2008 remake]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSequelRemakeContext
Context triple: [Klaatu barada nikto, hasSequelRemakeContext, referenced in discussions of 2008 remake]
  • A. hasSequel
    Indicates that one work is followed by another work that continues its story, timeline, or thematic development.
  • B. hasSequelPotential
    Indicates that a work or story has qualities suggesting it could be continued or expanded in a subsequent installment.
  • C. hasSequelRumors
    Indicates that there are rumors or unconfirmed reports suggesting a sequel exists or may be produced for the referenced work.
  • D. hasSequelType
    Indicates that one work has a sequel of a specified type or category in relation to another work.
  • E. hasSequelDepiction
    Indicates that one depiction of something is followed by another depiction that continues its story or sequence.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b4b0e79c8190bd61f22ef1329fa8 completed April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e6768ddfd0819098b2cc7fed0f4fe2 completed April 20, 2026, 6:55 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e55b1e5e1c8190ba8a5544b1db9e1d completed April 19, 2026, 10:45 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e56702ad04819099c1c08f28d16809 completed April 19, 2026, 11:36 p.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 10:36 a.m.