Triple
T20274851
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Red Wolf Woods |
E502984
|
entity |
| Predicate | featuresSpeciesConservationStatus |
P59532
|
FINISHED |
| Object | endangered |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: endangered | Statement: [Red Wolf Woods, featuresSpeciesConservationStatus, endangered]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: featuresSpeciesConservationStatus Context triple: [Red Wolf Woods, featuresSpeciesConservationStatus, endangered]
-
A.
subjectSpeciesStatus
chosen
Indicates the conservation or biological status assigned to the subject species (e.g., endangered, native, invasive, protected).
-
B.
conservationStatus
Indicates the level of risk or protection category assigned to an entity, typically reflecting how threatened it is with extinction or decline.
-
C.
featuresSpecies
Indicates that something includes, presents, or highlights a particular species as part of its content or composition.
-
D.
wildlifeProtectionStatus
Indicates the level or type of legal or conservation protection currently applied to wildlife.
-
E.
wildlifeStatus
Indicates the conservation or protection status assigned to wildlife, such as whether a species is endangered, threatened, or of least concern.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b4b0e79c8190bd61f22ef1329fa8 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:06 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e675e30d4c8190a9e2d9efa0f741fc |
completed | April 20, 2026, 6:52 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e55b1e5e1c8190ba8a5544b1db9e1d |
completed | April 19, 2026, 10:45 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 10:32 a.m.