Triple
T2027327
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Wabanaki Confederacy |
E44436
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasModernDescendant |
P32013
|
FINISHED |
| Object | contemporary Wabanaki tribal governments |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: contemporary Wabanaki tribal governments | Statement: [Wabanaki Confederacy, hasModernDescendant, contemporary Wabanaki tribal governments]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasModernDescendant Context triple: [Wabanaki Confederacy, hasModernDescendant, contemporary Wabanaki tribal governments]
-
A.
hasModernSuccessor
chosen
Indicates that an entity is followed or replaced by another entity that serves as its modern equivalent or continuation.
-
B.
hasModernName
Indicates that an entity is associated with its current or contemporary name, as opposed to an older or historical one.
-
C.
hasNotableDescendant
Indicates that an entity has at least one descendant who is recognized as notable or significant in some context.
-
D.
hasModernEditions
Indicates that an original work or text has one or more updated or contemporary published editions.
-
E.
hasSuccession
Indicates that one entity follows or replaces another in a sequence, order, or position, forming a succession relationship between them.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a889144f2481909932f0746a93023d |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abb911e5dc819097e40af0da4d01e7 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:35 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abb7a656248190ac2ced196b35bc6b |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:29 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:38 p.m.