Triple
T20266964
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Joe Satriani (1995 album) |
E498993
|
entity |
| Predicate | creditedMusician |
P139466
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Joe Satriani – guitars |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Joe Satriani – guitars | Statement: [Joe Satriani (1995 album), creditedMusician, Joe Satriani – guitars]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: creditedMusician Context triple: [Joe Satriani (1995 album), creditedMusician, Joe Satriani – guitars]
-
A.
creditedMixtapeArtist
Indicates that an artist is officially credited as a contributing or primary artist on a specific mixtape.
-
B.
notableMusician
Indicates that the subject is a musician who is widely recognized or distinguished for their musical work or impact.
-
C.
mentionsArtist
Indicates that one entity explicitly refers to or cites an artist in its content or context.
-
D.
featuresMusician
Indicates that something (such as a work, event, or recording) prominently includes or showcases a particular musician.
-
E.
favoriteMusician
Indicates that one entity is the musician whom another entity prefers above all others.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69da6275fa6c8190952924930adee150 |
completed | April 11, 2026, 3:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e674d001f081908910eedd262ae13a |
completed | April 20, 2026, 6:47 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e55b1e5e1c8190ba8a5544b1db9e1d |
completed | April 19, 2026, 10:45 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e56702ad04819099c1c08f28d16809 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 11:36 p.m. |
Created at: April 11, 2026, 11:42 p.m.