Triple
T20264513
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Warren |
E498928
|
entity |
| Predicate | emotionalConflictAbout |
P115245
|
FINISHED |
| Object | whether to take Silas back |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: whether to take Silas back | Statement: [Warren, emotionalConflictAbout, whether to take Silas back]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: emotionalConflictAbout Context triple: [Warren, emotionalConflictAbout, whether to take Silas back]
-
A.
relationshipConflictWith
Indicates a state of opposition, disagreement, or incompatibility between two entities within a relationship.
-
B.
conflictIn
Indicates that one entity is involved in, associated with, or occurs within a particular conflict or dispute.
-
C.
emotionalChallenge
chosen
Indicates a situation where one entity causes or experiences significant emotional difficulty or stress in relation to another entity or circumstance.
-
D.
centralConflictIn
Indicates that one situation, issue, or opposition serves as the primary source of tension or struggle within another context, such as a story, event, or scenario.
-
E.
facesConflictWith
Indicates that one entity is in opposition, dispute, or contention with another, involving incompatible goals, interests, or actions.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69da6275fa6c8190952924930adee150 |
completed | April 11, 2026, 3:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e674ce27688190b31d7a6c98d3ec5e |
completed | April 20, 2026, 6:47 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e55b1e5e1c8190ba8a5544b1db9e1d |
completed | April 19, 2026, 10:45 p.m. |
Created at: April 11, 2026, 11:41 p.m.