Triple
T20257886
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mahan confederacy |
E498751
|
entity |
| Predicate | memberPolities |
P139424
|
FINISHED |
| Object | multiple small chiefdoms |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: multiple small chiefdoms | Statement: [Mahan confederacy, memberPolities, multiple small chiefdoms]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: memberPolities Context triple: [Mahan confederacy, memberPolities, multiple small chiefdoms]
-
A.
linkedPolities
Indicates that two political entities are connected by some defined relationship, such as alliance, dependency, or shared governance.
-
B.
politicalEntityConstrained
Indicates that a political entity is subject to limitations, restrictions, or control imposed by another actor, rule, or condition.
-
C.
hasPolity
Indicates that one entity possesses, controls, or is associated with a particular political organization, governance structure, or state-like authority.
-
D.
politicalEntityWithin
Indicates that one political entity is geographically or administratively contained within another political entity.
-
E.
memberStatesOrganization
Indicates that an organization is composed of, or includes as members, the specified states.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69da6275fa6c8190952924930adee150 |
completed | April 11, 2026, 3:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e674c7296c819092860942de8f28d5 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 6:47 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e55b1b23f88190bdcbe2f81dd226dd |
completed | April 19, 2026, 10:45 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e56702ad04819099c1c08f28d16809 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 11:36 p.m. |
Created at: April 11, 2026, 11:41 p.m.