Triple
T20224716
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Grace of God |
E495346
|
entity |
| Predicate | theologicalThemeIn |
P57394
|
FINISHED |
| Object | systematic theology |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: systematic theology | Statement: [Grace of God, theologicalThemeIn, systematic theology]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: theologicalThemeIn Context triple: [Grace of God, theologicalThemeIn, systematic theology]
-
A.
theologicalFocus
Indicates that something is primarily concerned with, centered on, or directed toward theological themes, questions, or doctrines.
-
B.
theologicalConcept
Indicates that something is a religious or theological idea, doctrine, or principle within a belief system.
-
C.
theologicalCategory
Indicates the classification of something according to a particular theological type, tradition, or doctrinal category.
-
D.
theologyExpressedIn
Indicates that a theological idea, doctrine, or perspective is articulated, represented, or communicated through a particular medium, work, or expression.
-
E.
doctrinalTheme
chosen
Indicates that one entity concerns, expresses, or is characterized by a particular doctrinal or theological theme in relation to another.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69da626cff80819097b530718a7c98b6 |
completed | April 11, 2026, 3:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e66fd8f1948190adbb947a7870bb43 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 6:26 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e55b18609481909ab28bc8750a642f |
completed | April 19, 2026, 10:45 p.m. |
Created at: April 11, 2026, 11:39 p.m.