Triple

T20223213
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Sonnet 30 E495310 entity
Predicate addresseeType P139285 FINISHED
Object beloved friend LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: beloved friend | Statement: [Sonnet 30, addresseeType, beloved friend]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: addresseeType
Context triple: [Sonnet 30, addresseeType, beloved friend]
  • A. addresseeOf
    Indicates that one entity is the intended recipient or target audience of a communication, message, or expression from another entity.
  • B. addresseeDescription
    Indicates that one entity provides a descriptive characterization or identifying information about the addressee of a communication or message.
  • C. addressingType
    Indicates the manner or form in which one entity addresses or refers to another (e.g., formally, informally, by title, or by name).
  • D. addresseePosition
    Indicates the spatial or positional relationship of the addressee relative to a reference point or speaker.
  • E. addresseeStatus
    Indicates the role, condition, or state of the entity that is the recipient or target of a communication or action.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69da626cff80819097b530718a7c98b6 completed April 11, 2026, 3:02 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e66fd827708190b798a30f4e7d533f completed April 20, 2026, 6:26 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e55b18609481909ab28bc8750a642f completed April 19, 2026, 10:45 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e56700b1a08190ace53cf95827d72d completed April 19, 2026, 11:36 p.m.
Created at: April 11, 2026, 11:39 p.m.