Triple
T20220866
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Joseph P. Bradley |
E495249
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableWork |
P4
|
FINISHED |
| Object | opinion in the Civil Rights Cases (United States v. Stanley et al.) |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: opinion in the Civil Rights Cases (United States v. Stanley et al.) | Statement: [Joseph P. Bradley, notableWork, opinion in the Civil Rights Cases (United States v. Stanley et al.)]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: opinion in the Civil Rights Cases (United States v. Stanley et al.) Context triple: [Joseph P. Bradley, notableWork, opinion in the Civil Rights Cases (United States v. Stanley et al.)]
-
A.
The Civil Rights Cases (1883)
chosen
The Civil Rights Cases (1883) were a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down key provisions of the Civil Rights Act of 1875, severely limiting federal power to prohibit racial discrimination by private individuals and businesses.
-
B.
Opinion in Cooley v. Board of Wardens (1852)
The Opinion in Cooley v. Board of Wardens (1852) is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that helped define the scope of the Commerce Clause by allowing certain local regulations affecting interstate commerce when they address inherently local matters.
-
C.
Insular Cases
The Insular Cases are a series of early 20th-century U.S. Supreme Court decisions that defined the constitutional status and rights of residents in American overseas territories.
-
D.
McPherson v. Blacker
McPherson v. Blacker is an 1892 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state’s authority to determine how its presidential electors are chosen, affirming broad state control over the Electoral College selection process.
-
E.
Missouri ex rel. Gaines v. Canada
Missouri ex rel. Gaines v. Canada was a 1938 U.S. Supreme Court case that challenged racial segregation in higher education and laid important groundwork for the later decision in Brown v. Board of Education.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69da626cff80819097b530718a7c98b6 |
completed | April 11, 2026, 3:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e66edc88148190b003b72eb4c69da5 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 6:22 p.m. |
Created at: April 11, 2026, 11:39 p.m.