Triple
T2020498
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | FATCA Form 8938 |
E44092
|
entity |
| Predicate | filingAuthority |
P30230
|
FINISHED |
| Object | filed with the IRS |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: filed with the IRS | Statement: [FATCA Form 8938, filingAuthority, filed with the IRS]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: filingAuthority Context triple: [FATCA Form 8938, filingAuthority, filed with the IRS]
-
A.
filedWith
chosen
Indicates that one entity has officially submitted or registered something (such as a document, complaint, or application) to another entity or authority.
-
B.
filingMethod
Indicates how a document, record, or information is submitted or recorded, such as the process, channel, or format used for filing.
-
C.
designatesAuthority
Indicates that one entity formally assigns or confers decision-making power or control over something to another entity.
-
D.
designationAuthority
Indicates the entity that has the official power or responsibility to assign, grant, or confer a particular designation to another entity.
-
E.
prosecutingAuthority
Indicates that an entity serves as the official body responsible for bringing and conducting legal proceedings against another party in a criminal or regulatory case.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a8891201bc8190aca837be6de41579 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abb8d0bcbc8190bbbb726ecae1c51b |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:34 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abb7a389408190a84a54856352f15b |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:29 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:38 p.m.