Triple
T20198153
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Dunning Springs Park |
E493142
|
entity |
| Predicate | locatedIn |
P40
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Decorah, Iowa |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Decorah, Iowa | Statement: [Dunning Springs Park, locatedIn, Decorah, Iowa]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Decorah, Iowa Context triple: [Dunning Springs Park, locatedIn, Decorah, Iowa]
-
A.
Decorah, Iowa
chosen
Decorah, Iowa is a small city in northeastern Iowa known for its Norwegian-American heritage, scenic bluffs and trout streams, and as the home of Luther College.
-
B.
DeWitt, Iowa
DeWitt, Iowa is a small city in eastern Iowa known as a local commercial and residential hub within Clinton County.
-
C.
Lacey, Iowa
Lacey, Iowa is a small unincorporated rural community located in Mahaska County in the U.S. state of Iowa.
-
D.
Hancock, Iowa
Hancock, Iowa is a small rural city located in western Iowa within Pottawattamie County.
-
E.
Kalona, Iowa
Kalona, Iowa is a small city in southeastern Iowa known for its large Amish and Mennonite communities and rich agricultural heritage.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69da6269614c8190bb40475d9d477358 |
completed | April 11, 2026, 3:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e66d8afe408190a7a9202ed67698e6 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 6:16 p.m. |
Created at: April 11, 2026, 11:37 p.m.