Triple
T20196179
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | conditioned reflex |
E493090
|
entity |
| Predicate | canUndergo |
P139167
|
FINISHED |
| Object | acquisition |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: acquisition | Statement: [conditioned reflex, canUndergo, acquisition]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canUndergo Context triple: [conditioned reflex, canUndergo, acquisition]
-
A.
canMake
Indicates that one entity has the ability or capacity to create, produce, or assemble another entity.
-
B.
canElect
Indicates that one entity has the authority or ability to choose another entity for a position, role, or office through an election process.
-
C.
canBe
Indicates that one entity has the potential, permission, or capability to become, perform as, or be classified as another entity.
-
D.
mayConduct
Indicates that one entity is permitted or authorized to carry out, perform, or execute a particular action, process, or operation on or with another entity.
-
E.
canBePerformed
Indicates that a particular action or activity is possible to carry out under given conditions or by a specified agent.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69da6268a034819081cbd9ea5a1c9475 |
completed | April 11, 2026, 3:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e66ad8b3cc8190aa9c9c79c552002a |
completed | April 20, 2026, 6:05 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e55b14c9d8819095453d0504d9222f |
completed | April 19, 2026, 10:45 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e56700b1a08190ace53cf95827d72d |
completed | April 19, 2026, 11:36 p.m. |
Created at: April 11, 2026, 11:37 p.m.