Triple

T20191750
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Byleth E492992 entity
Predicate mysteriousOrigins P139077 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Byleth, mysteriousOrigins, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mysteriousOrigins
Context triple: [Byleth, mysteriousOrigins, true]
  • A. hadGreaterMysteries
    Indicates that one entity possessed or was associated with more profound, secret, or advanced mysteries than another entity.
  • B. focusesOnMysteries
    Indicates that the subject concentrates attention or effort specifically on mysteries, such as puzzling events, unknown phenomena, or unsolved cases.
  • C. allegedPhenomenon
    Indicates that something is claimed or reported to be a phenomenon, but its existence, cause, or nature is uncertain or disputed.
  • D. relatedMythicalPlace
    Indicates that one entity has an association or connection with a mythical or legendary place in relation to the other entity.
  • E. relatedMythicalPlace
    Indicates that one entity has an association or connection with a mythical or legendary place represented by the other entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69da6268a034819081cbd9ea5a1c9475 completed April 11, 2026, 3:02 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e66ad593f88190a1e534fed38b3cd7 completed April 20, 2026, 6:05 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e55b11124c8190babacf2a0fe2d057 completed April 19, 2026, 10:45 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e56700b1a08190ace53cf95827d72d completed April 19, 2026, 11:36 p.m.
Created at: April 11, 2026, 11:37 p.m.