Triple
T20189872
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hylians |
E492954
|
entity |
| Predicate | magicAffinity |
P139045
|
FINISHED |
| Object | high |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: high | Statement: [Hylians, magicAffinity, high]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: magicAffinity Context triple: [Hylians, magicAffinity, high]
-
A.
magicField
Indicates the presence or influence of a magical force or energy affecting an entity or area.
-
B.
typeOfMagic
Indicates that one entity is a specific category, school, or kind of magic associated with another entity.
-
C.
usesMagic
Indicates that an entity performs actions or achieves effects by employing magical powers or supernatural abilities.
-
D.
usesMagicFor
Indicates that one entity employs or applies magic as a means to achieve, affect, or perform something involving another entity or context.
-
E.
enchantment
Indicates that one entity has placed a magical or supernatural influence on another, altering its state, behavior, or properties.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69da6268a034819081cbd9ea5a1c9475 |
completed | April 11, 2026, 3:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e66ad4d7a88190b70dfb74a2daafba |
completed | April 20, 2026, 6:05 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e55b11124c8190babacf2a0fe2d057 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 10:45 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e56700b1a08190ace53cf95827d72d |
completed | April 19, 2026, 11:36 p.m. |
Created at: April 11, 2026, 11:37 p.m.