Triple
T20189010
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ideas I |
E492933
|
entity |
| Predicate | introducesProcedure |
P60622
|
FINISHED |
| Object | phenomenological epoché |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: phenomenological epoché | Statement: [Ideas I, introducesProcedure, phenomenological epoché]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: introducesProcedure Context triple: [Ideas I, introducesProcedure, phenomenological epoché]
-
A.
sectionIntroduced
Indicates that a particular section was introduced or added at a specific point in time or context.
-
B.
introducedProvision
Indicates that an entity formally brought a specific provision, clause, or measure into effect or into consideration.
-
C.
overseesProcedure
Indicates that one entity is responsible for supervising, managing, or directing the execution of a specific procedure performed by another entity.
-
D.
launchProcedure
chosen
Indicates the process or sequence of actions required to initiate or start an operation, system, or mission.
-
E.
introducesName
Indicates that one entity presents or gives a name or designation to another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69da6268a034819081cbd9ea5a1c9475 |
completed | April 11, 2026, 3:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e66ad404508190981cfb7cab18d8d3 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 6:05 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e55b11124c8190babacf2a0fe2d057 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 10:45 p.m. |
Created at: April 11, 2026, 11:37 p.m.