Triple
T20186081
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Link Layer Topology Discovery |
E492864
|
entity |
| Predicate | isProprietaryAlternativeTo |
P139025
|
FINISHED |
| Object | none |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: none | Statement: [Link Layer Topology Discovery, isProprietaryAlternativeTo, none]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isProprietaryAlternativeTo Context triple: [Link Layer Topology Discovery, isProprietaryAlternativeTo, none]
-
A.
isAlternativeTo
Indicates that one entity can serve as a substitute or different option in place of another.
-
B.
alternativeUsedBy
Indicates that one entity serves as an alternative option or substitute that is used in place of another entity.
-
C.
wasProprietaryUntil
Indicates that something was owned or controlled as proprietary (not publicly available or open) up to a specified point in time.
-
D.
containsProprietaryComponents
Indicates that one entity includes or is composed of components that are proprietary (owned, controlled, or restricted by a particular party).
-
E.
isTraditionalProductOf
Indicates that something is a customary or historically established product originating from a particular place, culture, or group.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69da6268a034819081cbd9ea5a1c9475 |
completed | April 11, 2026, 3:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e668f2c03c819096336462f59dba91 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 5:57 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e55b11124c8190babacf2a0fe2d057 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 10:45 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e56700b1a08190ace53cf95827d72d |
completed | April 19, 2026, 11:36 p.m. |
Created at: April 11, 2026, 11:36 p.m.