Triple
T20174011
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Consumer Reports |
E492041
|
entity |
| Predicate | independencePolicy |
P138970
|
FINISHED |
| Object | buys all products it tests |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: buys all products it tests | Statement: [Consumer Reports, independencePolicy, buys all products it tests]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: independencePolicy Context triple: [Consumer Reports, independencePolicy, buys all products it tests]
-
A.
politicalIndependenceRule
Indicates that an entity has the authority or status to act autonomously in political matters, free from control or governance by another entity.
-
B.
independenceCountry
Indicates that a country has achieved political independence, typically from a former governing or colonial power.
-
C.
independenceFrom
Indicates that one entity is not controlled, governed, or significantly influenced by another entity.
-
D.
representsIndependence
Indicates that one entity embodies, symbolizes, or confers independence in relation to another entity.
-
E.
independenceRecognized
Indicates that one entity formally acknowledges another entity’s status as independent and self-governing.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69da6266c6888190bc1a3ecf24814d34 |
completed | April 11, 2026, 3:01 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6684a33688190b22cfc16907e76bc |
completed | April 20, 2026, 5:54 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e55b0c11cc8190836d1eee5945f000 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 10:45 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e56700b1a08190ace53cf95827d72d |
completed | April 19, 2026, 11:36 p.m. |
Created at: April 11, 2026, 11:36 p.m.