Triple
T20173041
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Miquela |
E492016
|
entity |
| Predicate | grammaticalGenderInSpanish |
P138967
|
FINISHED |
| Object | feminine |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: feminine | Statement: [Miquela, grammaticalGenderInSpanish, feminine]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: grammaticalGenderInSpanish Context triple: [Miquela, grammaticalGenderInSpanish, feminine]
-
A.
hasGrammaticalGender
Indicates that one entity assigns or possesses a specific grammatical gender in relation to another entity (such as a word, phrase, or linguistic unit).
-
B.
hasNoGrammaticalGender
Indicates that the referenced entity or term is not associated with any grammatical gender category in the relevant language system.
-
C.
hasGenderInPortuguese
Indicates that a term or entity is associated with a specific grammatical gender in the Portuguese language.
-
D.
genderedPluralForm
Indicates that the plural form of a term is specifically marked or inflected to reflect a particular gender.
-
E.
genderSignificance
Indicates the relevance or impact that an entity’s gender has within a particular context, relationship, or interpretation.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69da6266c6888190bc1a3ecf24814d34 |
completed | April 11, 2026, 3:01 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e66849709c81909b65b421282f9f3b |
completed | April 20, 2026, 5:54 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e55b0c11cc8190836d1eee5945f000 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 10:45 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e56700b1a08190ace53cf95827d72d |
completed | April 19, 2026, 11:36 p.m. |
Created at: April 11, 2026, 11:35 p.m.