Triple

T20167079
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Cibola National Forest E491849 entity
Predicate contains P35 FINISHED
Object Mt. Taylor Ranger District — NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Mt. Taylor Ranger District | Statement: [Cibola National Forest, contains, Mt. Taylor Ranger District]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Mt. Taylor Ranger District
Context triple: [Cibola National Forest, contains, Mt. Taylor Ranger District]
  • A. Socorro Ranger District
    The Socorro Ranger District is an administrative unit of the Cibola National Forest in central New Mexico that manages public lands and natural resources, including the San Mateo Mountains.
  • B. Tusayan Ranger District
    Tusayan Ranger District is an administrative unit of the Kaibab National Forest in northern Arizona that manages forest resources, recreation, and conservation near the Grand Canyon.
  • C. Mesa Ranger District
    Mesa Ranger District is an administrative unit of the Tonto National Forest in central Arizona, responsible for managing recreation, wildlife, and natural resources in the Mesa-area portion of the forest.
  • D. Safford Ranger District
    The Safford Ranger District is an administrative unit of the U.S. Forest Service in southeastern Arizona that manages public lands including the Mount Graham area.
  • E. Barlow Ranger District
    Barlow Ranger District is an administrative unit of the U.S. Forest Service responsible for managing a portion of the Mount Hood National Forest in Oregon.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Mt. Taylor Ranger District
Target entity description: Mt. Taylor Ranger District is an administrative unit of the Cibola National Forest in New Mexico, known for managing forest resources and recreational activities around Mount Taylor and its surrounding landscapes.
  • A. Socorro Ranger District
    The Socorro Ranger District is an administrative unit of the Cibola National Forest in central New Mexico that manages public lands and natural resources, including the San Mateo Mountains.
  • B. Tusayan Ranger District
    Tusayan Ranger District is an administrative unit of the Kaibab National Forest in northern Arizona that manages forest resources, recreation, and conservation near the Grand Canyon.
  • C. Mesa Ranger District
    Mesa Ranger District is an administrative unit of the Tonto National Forest in central Arizona, responsible for managing recreation, wildlife, and natural resources in the Mesa-area portion of the forest.
  • D. Safford Ranger District
    The Safford Ranger District is an administrative unit of the U.S. Forest Service in southeastern Arizona that manages public lands including the Mount Graham area.
  • E. Barlow Ranger District
    Barlow Ranger District is an administrative unit of the U.S. Forest Service responsible for managing a portion of the Mount Hood National Forest in Oregon.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69da6266c6888190bc1a3ecf24814d34 completed April 11, 2026, 3:01 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e66844e49081909b7e9ec2b65cc61d completed April 20, 2026, 5:54 p.m.
Created at: April 11, 2026, 11:35 p.m.