Triple

T20157635
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Moonraker E491614 entity
Predicate antagonistPlan P108466 FINISHED
Object use of rocket to attack London LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: use of rocket to attack London | Statement: [Moonraker, antagonistPlan, use of rocket to attack London]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: antagonistPlan
Context triple: [Moonraker, antagonistPlan, use of rocket to attack London]
  • A. antagonistActionOf
    Indicates that one entity performs an action in opposition or hostility toward another entity, acting as its antagonist.
  • B. missionOfAntagonist chosen
    Indicates the primary goal, plan, or objective that the antagonist is actively pursuing.
  • C. antagonistOf
    Indicates a relationship where one entity actively opposes, conflicts with, or serves as an adversary to another.
  • D. antagonistInvolved
    Indicates that an antagonist participates in, influences, or is otherwise actively involved in the referenced event or situation.
  • E. hasAntagonisticProtagonist
    Indicates that the work features a main character who opposes or undermines the typical heroic or moral expectations of a traditional protagonist.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69da6265f8f0819080b29c752a574088 completed April 11, 2026, 3:01 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e667e18a0c8190a2cc2b305da28047 completed April 20, 2026, 5:52 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e54cfd924881909b55f3e4d3e7e070 completed April 19, 2026, 9:45 p.m.
Created at: April 11, 2026, 11:34 p.m.