Triple
T20132609
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Berry |
E490933
|
entity |
| Predicate | preFrenchRevolutionProvince |
P25984
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Berry, preFrenchRevolutionProvince, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: preFrenchRevolutionProvince Context triple: [Berry, preFrenchRevolutionProvince, true]
-
A.
singleCommuneProvince
Indicates that a province contains exactly one commune within its administrative boundaries.
-
B.
formerProvince
chosen
Indicates that an entity was previously a province of another entity but no longer holds that administrative status.
-
C.
historicalProvinceGroup
Indicates that two or more provinces are grouped together based on sharing a common historical administrative or territorial affiliation.
-
D.
partyRoleOfFrance
Indicates the specific role or capacity that France holds as a party within a given agreement, event, or relationship.
-
E.
isProvinceOf
Indicates that one region holds the administrative status of a province within, and is governed as a subnational division of, another political entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69da62651a0c8190a3e05e95e056a66b |
completed | April 11, 2026, 3:01 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e66763ee908190af64af31b4ca2377 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 5:50 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e54cfb0d0081908e789b9b57e96668 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 9:45 p.m. |
Created at: April 11, 2026, 11:31 p.m.