Triple

T20115327
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Timurid–Ottoman conflicts E490444 entity
Predicate hasPart P35 FINISHED
Object Battle of Erzincan NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Battle of Erzincan | Statement: [Timurid–Ottoman conflicts, hasPart, Battle of Erzincan]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Battle of Erzincan
Context triple: [Timurid–Ottoman conflicts, hasPart, Battle of Erzincan]
  • A. Battle of Karababa
    The Battle of Karababa was a significant engagement between Russian and Persian forces during the early 19th-century Russo-Persian War, reflecting the broader struggle for dominance in the Caucasus region.
  • B. Battle of Kütahya–Eskişehir
    The Battle of Kütahya–Eskişehir was a major engagement of the Greco-Turkish War (1919–1922) in which advancing Greek forces temporarily captured key central Anatolian cities from Turkish nationalist troops, setting the stage for the later Battle of Sakarya.
  • C. Battle of Incegiz
    The Battle of Incegiz was a 12th-century military engagement during the reign of Byzantine emperor Manuel I Komnenos, reflecting his efforts to defend and expand Byzantine influence in the Balkans and Anatolia.
  • D. Battle of Kurukdere
    The Battle of Kurukdere was a major engagement of the Crimean War’s Caucasus front between Russian and Ottoman forces, notable for its decisive Russian victory and impact on control of the Transcaucasian region.
  • E. Battle of Bayandir
    The Battle of Bayandir was a World War I engagement in the Caucasus region between the Ottoman Empire and Russian forces, forming part of the broader Caucasus campaign.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Battle of Erzincan
Target entity description: The Battle of Erzincan was a 15th-century clash in eastern Anatolia between the forces of Timur (Tamerlane) and the Ottoman Empire, contributing to the weakening of Ottoman power before the more decisive Battle of Ankara.
  • A. Battle of Karababa
    The Battle of Karababa was a significant engagement between Russian and Persian forces during the early 19th-century Russo-Persian War, reflecting the broader struggle for dominance in the Caucasus region.
  • B. Battle of Kütahya–Eskişehir
    The Battle of Kütahya–Eskişehir was a major engagement of the Greco-Turkish War (1919–1922) in which advancing Greek forces temporarily captured key central Anatolian cities from Turkish nationalist troops, setting the stage for the later Battle of Sakarya.
  • C. Battle of Incegiz
    The Battle of Incegiz was a 12th-century military engagement during the reign of Byzantine emperor Manuel I Komnenos, reflecting his efforts to defend and expand Byzantine influence in the Balkans and Anatolia.
  • D. Battle of Kurukdere
    The Battle of Kurukdere was a major engagement of the Crimean War’s Caucasus front between Russian and Ottoman forces, notable for its decisive Russian victory and impact on control of the Transcaucasian region.
  • E. Battle of Bayandir
    The Battle of Bayandir was a World War I engagement in the Caucasus region between the Ottoman Empire and Russian forces, forming part of the broader Caucasus campaign.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69da62636cc08190982cc71733a17b8d completed April 11, 2026, 3:01 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e666e3f2288190840d1eb431ac9a1b completed April 20, 2026, 5:48 p.m.
Created at: April 11, 2026, 11:29 p.m.