Triple

T20102681
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject PH-960 E496584 entity
Predicate hasNoFrameNarrative P138707 FINISHED
Object non-narrative composition LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: non-narrative composition | Statement: [PH-960, hasNoFrameNarrative, non-narrative composition]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasNoFrameNarrative
Context triple: [PH-960, hasNoFrameNarrative, non-narrative composition]
  • A. hasNoNarrative
    Indicates that an entity lacks any associated story, plot, or descriptive narrative content.
  • B. narrativeFrame
    Indicates the overarching narrative context or perspective within which events, actions, or relationships are presented or interpreted.
  • C. hasNarrative
    Indicates that one entity contains, presents, or is associated with a story or narrative about another entity or subject.
  • D. containsNarrativeOf
    Indicates that one entity includes or presents the story, account, or narrative content of another entity.
  • E. narrativeFrameWork
    Indicates a relationship where one element provides the structural or conceptual framework within which another element’s narrative is organized, interpreted, or presented.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69da626eee3881909f3454986d4a6511 completed April 11, 2026, 3:02 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e6667170a4819085d07a4188ded541 completed April 20, 2026, 5:46 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e54cf788188190a46cc49c9ce7617f completed April 19, 2026, 9:45 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e54fc2bc3c819088c33cd263303433 completed April 19, 2026, 9:57 p.m.
Created at: April 11, 2026, 11:27 p.m.