Triple
T2009437
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Maybe I’m Amazed |
E43657
|
entity |
| Predicate | isWidelyAcclaimed |
P17136
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Maybe I’m Amazed, isWidelyAcclaimed, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isWidelyAcclaimed Context triple: [Maybe I’m Amazed, isWidelyAcclaimed, true]
-
A.
isConsideredOneOfTheGreatestIn
Indicates that an entity is widely regarded or recognized as among the best or most outstanding within a particular field, domain, or context.
-
B.
alsoCalledByCritics
Indicates that critics refer to the same entity by an alternative name or label.
-
C.
consideredClassic
chosen
Indicates that something is widely regarded or recognized as a classic within a particular field, genre, or context.
-
D.
haveInternationalRecognition
Indicates that an entity is formally acknowledged or accepted by the international community or by official bodies across multiple countries.
-
E.
popularizedIn
Indicates that something became widely known, accepted, or fashionable within a particular place, time period, or context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88716e9f08190946313fdc949e3cf |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:25 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abb89be08c81909eb5ea672ea46b2b |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:33 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abb7a03a1c81909ad50d56667db2d5 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:29 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:37 p.m.