Triple
T20092153
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Zgierz |
E496296
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasTwinTown |
P919
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Câmpina |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Câmpina | Statement: [Zgierz, hasTwinTown, Câmpina]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Câmpina Context triple: [Zgierz, hasTwinTown, Câmpina]
-
A.
Câmpina
chosen
Câmpina is a town in southern Romania known historically as an important oil industry center and a gateway to the Prahova Valley.
-
B.
Câmpeni
Câmpeni is a small town in central Romania, located in the Apuseni Mountains region of Alba County and known historically for its role in Romanian national movements.
-
C.
Ciampea
Ciampea is a district in West Java, Indonesia, known as part of the suburban and semi-rural area surrounding the city of Bogor.
-
D.
Pucisca
Pučišća is a picturesque coastal town on the Croatian island of Brač, known for its white limestone quarries and traditional stone masonry.
-
E.
Arrecina
Arrecina is an ancient Roman family name (nomen) associated with members of the early Imperial aristocracy.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69da626eee3881909f3454986d4a6511 |
completed | April 11, 2026, 3:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e66668db8881908c43b1deef9af1d3 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 5:46 p.m. |
Created at: April 11, 2026, 11:22 p.m.