Triple

T20085274
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject New Hampshire Grants E500109 entity
Predicate disputedWith P28645 FINISHED
Object New York land patents NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: New York land patents | Statement: [New Hampshire Grants, disputedWith, New York land patents]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: New York land patents
Context triple: [New Hampshire Grants, disputedWith, New York land patents]
  • A. Hardenbergh Patent
    The Hardenbergh Patent was a massive early 18th-century land grant in colonial New York that helped shape settlement and landownership patterns in the Catskills region.
  • B. Connecticut Land Company
    The Connecticut Land Company was a group of investors formed in the late 18th century to purchase and develop the Western Reserve in what is now northeastern Ohio.
  • C. Harrietstown tract
    The Harrietstown tract is a historic land grant or surveyed parcel in upstate New York that gave its name to the town of Harrietstown.
  • D. Yazoo land companies
    The Yazoo land companies were a group of speculative land corporations involved in a notorious late-18th-century scandal over the fraudulent sale of vast tracts of what is now Alabama and Mississippi by the state of Georgia.
  • E. Seneca reservations in New York
    The Seneca reservations in New York are sovereign Native American territories in western New York that serve as the remaining homelands of the Seneca Nation, a member of the Haudenosaunee (Iroquois) Confederacy.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: New York land patents
Target entity description: New York land patents were colonial-era land grants issued by the Province of New York that became the basis for major territorial disputes over ownership and jurisdiction in what is now Vermont and surrounding regions.
  • A. Hardenbergh Patent
    The Hardenbergh Patent was a massive early 18th-century land grant in colonial New York that helped shape settlement and landownership patterns in the Catskills region.
  • B. Connecticut Land Company
    The Connecticut Land Company was a group of investors formed in the late 18th century to purchase and develop the Western Reserve in what is now northeastern Ohio.
  • C. Harrietstown tract
    The Harrietstown tract is a historic land grant or surveyed parcel in upstate New York that gave its name to the town of Harrietstown.
  • D. Yazoo land companies
    The Yazoo land companies were a group of speculative land corporations involved in a notorious late-18th-century scandal over the fraudulent sale of vast tracts of what is now Alabama and Mississippi by the state of Georgia.
  • E. Seneca reservations in New York
    The Seneca reservations in New York are sovereign Native American territories in western New York that serve as the remaining homelands of the Seneca Nation, a member of the Haudenosaunee (Iroquois) Confederacy.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69da627770948190997f486f9a2e370f completed April 11, 2026, 3:02 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e6655ae9ec8190bde2f17452639de8 completed April 20, 2026, 5:41 p.m.
Created at: April 11, 2026, 3:41 p.m.