Triple
T20085112
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lake Jocassee |
E500104
|
entity |
| Predicate | inflow |
P415
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Whitewater River |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Whitewater River | Statement: [Lake Jocassee, inflow, Whitewater River]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Whitewater River Context triple: [Lake Jocassee, inflow, Whitewater River]
-
A.
Whitewater River
chosen
Whitewater River is a river that serves as the main watercourse of the Whitewater River watershed, known for its flowing waters and surrounding natural habitats.
-
B.
Whitewater
Whitewater is a small rural town located in Cape Girardeau County in southeastern Missouri, United States.
-
C.
Whitewater
Whitewater is a small river in Hampshire, England, known as one of the principal tributaries of the River Loddon within the Thames basin.
-
D.
Cottonwood River
The Cottonwood River is a tributary of the Minnesota River in southern Minnesota, flowing through communities such as New Ulm and supporting regional agriculture and wildlife.
-
E.
Cottonwood River
The Cottonwood River is a tributary of the Neosho River in central Kansas, flowing through the city of Emporia and the surrounding prairie landscape.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69da627770948190997f486f9a2e370f |
completed | April 11, 2026, 3:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6655ae9ec8190bde2f17452639de8 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 5:41 p.m. |
Created at: April 11, 2026, 3:41 p.m.