Triple
T20078544
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Naxians |
E499933
|
entity |
| Predicate | artInfluenced |
P20089
|
FINISHED |
| Object | other Cycladic poleis |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: other Cycladic poleis | Statement: [Naxians, artInfluenced, other Cycladic poleis]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: artInfluenced Context triple: [Naxians, artInfluenced, other Cycladic poleis]
-
A.
influenceOnArt
chosen
Indicates that one entity has affected, shaped, or inspired the artistic style, content, or development of another.
-
B.
creativeInfluence
Indicates that one entity has shaped, inspired, or informed the creative work, style, or ideas of another entity.
-
C.
inspiredArtMovement
Indicates that one entity served as a creative or conceptual influence leading to the development or direction of an art movement in the other entity.
-
D.
artMovement
Indicates the artistic movement or style with which an artwork, artist, or cultural work is associated.
-
E.
inspiredArtist
Indicates that one artist has served as a source of creative influence or inspiration for another artist.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69da627770948190997f486f9a2e370f |
completed | April 11, 2026, 3:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6643e216c819088c002fc1de2772a |
completed | April 20, 2026, 5:37 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e54cf369b88190931532420517dac7 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 9:45 p.m. |
Created at: April 11, 2026, 3:40 p.m.