Triple

T20070162
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Prefect of the French Southern and Antarctic Lands E499710 entity
Predicate governs P760 FINISHED
Object French Antarctic claim NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: French Antarctic claim | Statement: [Prefect of the French Southern and Antarctic Lands, governs, French Antarctic claim]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: French Antarctic claim
Context triple: [Prefect of the French Southern and Antarctic Lands, governs, French Antarctic claim]
  • A. Norwegian Antarctic claim
    The Norwegian Antarctic claim is Norway’s territorial claim in Antarctica, encompassing Queen Maud Land and associated coastal regions under Norwegian administration and research activity.
  • B. Spanish Antarctica
    Spanish Antarctica refers to the sector of Antarctica historically claimed and administered by Spain as part of its overseas territories, though such claims are held in abeyance under the Antarctic Treaty System.
  • C. Argentine Antarctica
    Argentine Antarctica is the sector of Antarctica claimed by Argentina, encompassing a portion of the continent and surrounding islands in the southern Atlantic and Antarctic regions.
  • D. Antarctic policy of Chile
    The Antarctic policy of Chile is the national framework guiding Chile’s territorial claims, scientific activities, environmental protection, and international cooperation in Antarctica.
  • E. Antarctic Treaty area
    The Antarctic Treaty area is the region south of 60° South latitude governed by the Antarctic Treaty System, dedicated to peaceful scientific cooperation and environmental protection.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: French Antarctic claim
Target entity description: The French Antarctic claim is a sector of Antarctica over which France asserts sovereignty as part of its overseas territory, the French Southern and Antarctic Lands.
  • A. Norwegian Antarctic claim
    The Norwegian Antarctic claim is Norway’s territorial claim in Antarctica, encompassing Queen Maud Land and associated coastal regions under Norwegian administration and research activity.
  • B. Spanish Antarctica
    Spanish Antarctica refers to the sector of Antarctica historically claimed and administered by Spain as part of its overseas territories, though such claims are held in abeyance under the Antarctic Treaty System.
  • C. Argentine Antarctica
    Argentine Antarctica is the sector of Antarctica claimed by Argentina, encompassing a portion of the continent and surrounding islands in the southern Atlantic and Antarctic regions.
  • D. Antarctic policy of Chile
    The Antarctic policy of Chile is the national framework guiding Chile’s territorial claims, scientific activities, environmental protection, and international cooperation in Antarctica.
  • E. Antarctic Treaty area
    The Antarctic Treaty area is the region south of 60° South latitude governed by the Antarctic Treaty System, dedicated to peaceful scientific cooperation and environmental protection.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69da627770948190997f486f9a2e370f completed April 11, 2026, 3:02 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e6643798a4819081fa4e71c74b47bc completed April 20, 2026, 5:36 p.m.
Created at: April 11, 2026, 3:40 p.m.