Triple

T20044395
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject José Nieto Velázquez E497517 entity
Predicate possibleRelationshipToDiegoVelázquez P138478 FINISHED
Object relative or in-law LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: relative or in-law | Statement: [José Nieto Velázquez, possibleRelationshipToDiegoVelázquez, relative or in-law]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: possibleRelationshipToDiegoVelázquez
Context triple: [José Nieto Velázquez, possibleRelationshipToDiegoVelázquez, relative or in-law]
  • A. relationshipTypeWith Aureliano Segundo
    Indicates the specific nature or category of relational connection that an entity has with Aureliano Segundo.
  • B. eraDepicted
    Indicates that a work or representation portrays, illustrates, or is set in a particular historical era or time period.
  • C. relationshipToCharlesV
    Indicates the specific familial or social relationship that one entity has to Charles V.
  • D. relationshipToAntonioVillalta
    Indicates the nature of the relationship or connection that an entity has to Antonio Villalta.
  • E. relationshipToFlorentinoAriza
    Indicates the nature of the relationship an entity has with Florentino Ariza.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69da627278c88190babe4297a9df1236 completed April 11, 2026, 3:02 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e662eea09481908d1001165e9d719c completed April 20, 2026, 5:31 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e54ce752748190a0a1ffddd0372271 completed April 19, 2026, 9:45 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e54fc20888819083c9118a09d0d2dc completed April 19, 2026, 9:57 p.m.
Created at: April 11, 2026, 3:37 p.m.