Triple

T20043503
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Argentina and Paraguay E497490 entity
Predicate haveSecurityCooperation P105047 FINISHED
Object border security collaboration LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: border security collaboration | Statement: [Argentina and Paraguay, haveSecurityCooperation, border security collaboration]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: haveSecurityCooperation
Context triple: [Argentina and Paraguay, haveSecurityCooperation, border security collaboration]
  • A. hasMilitaryCooperationAt
    Indicates that two or more entities engage in military cooperation at or in relation to a specific location or venue.
  • B. hasCooperationFramework
    Indicates that two or more entities are formally linked by an agreed framework that governs how they cooperate or collaborate with each other.
  • C. securityCooperationFormat chosen
    Indicates the type or structure of collaborative security arrangements or mechanisms established between entities.
  • D. militaryCooperation
    Indicates a collaborative relationship in which entities coordinate, support, or jointly conduct military activities, operations, or planning.
  • E. hasLegalCooperation
    Indicates that one entity engages in formal legal collaboration or assistance with another entity, typically through agreements, joint actions, or shared legal responsibilities.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69da627278c88190babe4297a9df1236 completed April 11, 2026, 3:02 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e662ed59bc8190a9ff25493e500ebb completed April 20, 2026, 5:31 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e54ce752748190a0a1ffddd0372271 completed April 19, 2026, 9:45 p.m.
Created at: April 11, 2026, 3:37 p.m.