Triple
T20033731
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Pennsylvania proprietors |
E497203
|
entity |
| Predicate | reformDemand |
P94743
|
FINISHED |
| Object | conversion of Pennsylvania to royal colony |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: conversion of Pennsylvania to royal colony | Statement: [Pennsylvania proprietors, reformDemand, conversion of Pennsylvania to royal colony]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: reformDemand Context triple: [Pennsylvania proprietors, reformDemand, conversion of Pennsylvania to royal colony]
-
A.
demandedReformFrom
chosen
Indicates that one party insisted that another party implement or agree to specific changes or reforms.
-
B.
reform
Indicates bringing about significant changes to an existing system, practice, or entity in order to improve or correct it.
-
C.
advocatedReformOf
Indicates that one entity publicly supported or promoted changes to another entity, typically aiming to improve or modify its structure, policies, or practices.
-
D.
reformsBy
Indicates that one entity initiates, implements, or is responsible for changes or improvements (reforms) affecting another entity.
-
E.
requestedReform
Indicates that one entity has asked another entity to implement or consider a specific reform or change to an existing system, policy, or practice.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69da627278c88190babe4297a9df1236 |
completed | April 11, 2026, 3:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e662e6a7e481908069c1de2b3f94e0 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 5:31 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e54ce752748190a0a1ffddd0372271 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 9:45 p.m. |
Created at: April 11, 2026, 3:36 p.m.